AI prompts for teachers
Last updated
AI gives teachers back the hours that aren't teaching: materials in three difficulty levels, feedback drafts that keep your voice, parent emails with the right tone, quizzes with distractors that reveal misconceptions. The five templates below target exactly those hours.
The quality lever is your classroom context: grade level, prior knowledge, the specific misconception you keep seeing. Generic grade-7 prompts produce generic grade-7 worksheets — the placeholders below force the specifics that make material land.
How to prompt as a teacher
- Name the real starting point: "grade 7, second year of English, still confusing past simple and present perfect" beats "intermediate".
- Anchor to your curriculum: name the standard or textbook chapter so material aligns instead of floating.
- Never paste student names or identifying details — use initials or roles; data protection applies to AI tools fully.
- Keep judgment human: AI drafts feedback and grades nothing. You decide what's fair; it types the paragraphs.
The five templates
New topic next week — and you already know where half the class will stumble.
You are my [subject] planning partner. Plan a [45/60/90]-minute lesson for grade [X] on [TOPIC]. The misconception to attack head-on: [WHAT STUDENTS TYPICALLY GET WRONG, E.G. "THEY THINK HEAVIER OBJECTS FALL FASTER"]. Prior knowledge: [WHAT THEY CAN DO]. Constraints: [CLASS SIZE, ROOM/TECH, ENERGY LEVEL AFTER LUNCH?]. Format: phase table (minutes, teacher does, students do, material), one hook in the first 5 minutes that makes the misconception visible, one check-for-understanding I can run in 3 minutes, homework in two variants (core / stretch). Before planning, ask me up to 3 questions if anything above is unclear.
Same text or problem set, one class, three real ability levels — and one evening to prepare.
Differentiate the material below into three versions for grade [X]: - **Support**: same core content, simplified sentence structure, key terms glossed, worked example first, [SCAFFOLD, E.G. SENTENCE STARTERS]. - **Core**: as designed, standard demands. - **Stretch**: same topic, added transfer task and one open question with no single right answer. Rules: all three versions must look similar at a glance (no stigma by layout), identical learning goal, and each ends with the same 2-question self-check so I can compare. Material: [PASTE TEXT / TASK SET] Learning goal: [ONE SENTENCE]
28 essays, one weekend. The comments should still sound like you and name specifics.
Help me write feedback. First, here are two examples of feedback I've written that sound like me:
[PASTE 2 EXAMPLES]
For each student note below (initials + my shorthand observations), write 3–4 sentences of feedback in exactly that voice: one concrete strength (quote or name the specific spot), one priority to improve with a how-to, one forward-looking sentence. No generic praise ("good job"), no sandwich formula. Grade level: [X], assignment: [WHAT IT WAS].
Notes:
- [A.B.: strong thesis, evidence thin in ¶2, conclusion repeats intro]
- [C.D.: …]
A sensitive message — missed work, behavior, a grade dispute — that must be firm, kind and un-quotable-out-of-context.
Draft an email to the parents of a grade-[X] student (no names — I'll insert them). Situation, facts only: [WHAT HAPPENED, DATES, WHAT WAS ALREADY COMMUNICATED]. Goal of the email: [E.G. AGREE ON A SUPPORT PLAN / INFORM BEFORE GRADES]. Tone: warm, factual, zero blame language toward the child — describe behavior, never character. Format: max 150 words. Structure: shared goal first, observations as dated facts, one concrete proposal with two time options, invitation to respond. Then list 3 phrases I should be ready to say if they call upset. Avoid: "concerned about", "unfortunately", diagnosis-adjacent words [E.G. "ATTENTION ISSUES"].
You want a check that tells you what students misunderstand — not just who guessed well.
Create a [10]-question quiz for grade [X] on [TOPIC]. Rules: mix of [6] multiple-choice, [2] short-answer, [2] transfer questions. For every multiple-choice item, each wrong option must encode a REAL misconception — label it for me (e.g. "distractor B = sign error"). Difficulty ramp: 1–3 warm-up, 4–8 core, 9–10 stretch. Include the answer key with one-line explanations I can read aloud. Source material — only test what's actually in here: [PASTE LESSON MATERIAL / TEXTBOOK EXCERPT]
Frequently asked questions
Am I allowed to use AI for grading?
Rules vary by school system — check yours. A safe pattern everywhere: AI drafts formative feedback from YOUR observations (as in the template), while summative grades and judgments stay entirely yours. Never upload identifiable student work without clearance.
How do I stop students from just AI-generating homework?
Shift what you assess: in-class application, oral defenses of written work, process artifacts (drafts, notes), and tasks anchored to class-specific context an AI can't know. The quiz template's transfer questions are one building block.
Will AI-made materials fit my curriculum?
Only if you anchor them: name the standard, grade and textbook chapter in the prompt, and paste source material so the AI tests what you taught (the templates do this). Review remains yours — AI drafts, you decide.
What about students with special needs?
The differentiation template handles level scaffolds, but individual accommodations (IEPs and equivalents) are specialist territory: use AI to draft variants, then check against the student's actual plan — and never paste the plan itself into a consumer tool.